What are the beliefs held by Campus Crusade about the Bible?

First, let’s define what I mean by “the Bible”.

Let’s look at what Campus Crusade for Christ’s statement of faith says on the issue:

The sole basis of our beliefs is the Bible, God’s infallible written Word, the 66 books of the Old and New Testaments. We believe that it was uniquely, verbally and fully inspired by the Holy Spirit and that it was written without error (inerrant) in the original manuscripts. It is the supreme and final authority in all matters on which it speaks.

Cru believes, along with the Protestant branch of the Christian faith, that the Bible consists of 66 books consisting of the 39 books of the Hebrew Bible (commonly known as the Old Testament) and the 27 books of the New Testament. The Roman Catholic and Eastern Orthodox canons include several books that we, in accordance with the Jewish belief and tradition, would not. These books (Esdras, Tobit, Judith, Maccabees, Odes, Wisdom of Solomon, Sirach & Baruch) are regarded by many as being profitable to read but are not considered “Scripture” in that they are not believed to have any authority on belief or doctrine. These rejections are most often based on ancient Jewish rejections of them as authoritative.

How much do we trust it?

There’s an ongoing debate within the Church about how far we take the words of the Bible to be true. This is where the words infallible, fully inspired, and inerrant come into play as well as the entire last sentence of the quote from the Statement. We will get into this more in a later post, but here’s the quick run-through.

What does the Bible seem to say about itself?

Psalm 12:6 The words of the Lord are pure words, like silver refined in a furnace on the ground, purified seven times.

Proverbs 30:5 Every word of God proves true; He is a shield to those who take refuge in Him.

One of the books that we read a lot when going through our training (initial and ongoing) with Campus Crusade is Wayne Grudem’s Systematic Theology, a 57-chapter 1291-page tome that covers a huge swath of Christian theology at an admirable depth. In one of the seven chapters on the Bible he defines what we mean by “inerrant”:

The inerrancy of Scripture means that Scripture in the original manuscripts does not affirm anything that is contrary to fact.

Grudem elaborates that the doctrine of infallibility allows for and assumes the following:

  1. The Bible uses everyday language and ordinary speech.
    For example, when it talks about the sun “rising” it is speaking in the normal (non-scientific) sense. When it says that Jesus fed 4,000 there may have been 3,956 or 4,103 people, we recognize this to be the case just like when we talk about the 4,000-person snowball fight in Dupont during “snowmageddon”.
  2. The Bible uses loose or free quotations as was acceptable in its contemporary literary tradition.
    The definition of “quotation” as word-by-word is a fairly modern and thoroughly Western phenomenon. Ancient Greek and Hebrew had no quotation marks and like many places in the world even today quotes of what someone said need only to accurately convey the content of their remarks. “He said he’ll be home shortly” is consistent with a the subject saying, “I’ll leave for dinner in two minutes.”
  3. The Bible uses irregular and uncommon grammar in certain instances.
    The use of plural verbs for singular actors, alternate spellings, feminine adjectives for masculine objects are not unusual in the Bible (especially Revelation). It should not surprise us that these passages could still be truthful, just as someone who speaks with a “backwoods” dialect could still be the most trustworthy person in the world.

“Verbally and fully inspired…”

This simply means that we believe that the whole of the Bible was authored by God, by the power of the Holy Spirit working through human agents who imparted some piece of their own written inflection and perspective without tainting the accounts by error or sin.

Resources

At the end of each post I will attempt to add a list of resources to read or check out if you want to understand more about what I’ve said.

{ 2 comments }

I just thought it was great that there was a book called Bible Football.

Questions About the Bible?

by jayson on February 19, 2010

This past Wednesday DC Cru held one of our “large group” events and discussed the authority and reliability of the Bible. As a part of it we opened the door to have people ask questions about it, but we were not able to address them in a complete manner, nor were we able to answer all of them. I want to write a series of emails to accompany Wednesday’s discussions, I’ll post them on the DC Cru Blog as well as the Facebook group and fan page.

Before I attempt to address the questions, I want to finish “collecting” the questions that are really being posed.

Here is the list that I’m planning on working from, please comment at the end of the post and add any that you are wondering about.

  • What are the different Christian views on the nature of the Bible? What does inerrancy and infallibility mean? Is the Bible only reliable when it talks about spiritual matters or is it also correct when it addresses history & science?
  • How was the Bible written? What interaction did God and the human authors have that produced these texts?
  • How did we get the Canon? What determined which books made the list and which did not? What happened to the books that were not determined to be part of the Canon?
  • How have we gotten the Bible that we read today? What has been the process of translation over the centuries? How do we know that our translations are really what the original authors wrote?
  • What are the main themes of the Bible? What is the main point?
  • What is in the Bible? How should I read it? Where should I start? What background information should I keep in mind as I read?
  • What about the really crazy stuff and the stuff that doesn’t seem to match up with Jesus? Genocide? Man-eating and man-puking fish?
  • What about when [INSERT NAME HERE] did that thing that seems to be totally evil? How can the Bible possibly say that that was a good thing?

Does that seem like I covered the range of questions? What else do you want to ask? Are there subpoints of that list that you’d like to add? On Monday I’ll start to post some responses to these questions.

{ 0 comments }

Christopher Hitchens’ Gospel and Our Words

January 28, 2010

I just posted this over at my own blog, and I figure I should share it here.

I think most Christians who are aware of who Christopher Hitchens is assumes that he doesn’t really understand the message of the Christian faith, that he really just needs to understand what it’s really all about and then he’d [...]

Read the full article →

Intimacy Vulnerability

January 22, 2010

Recently I woke up in the middle of the night with one word on my mind. Intimacy.
As I sleeplessly thought on intimacy and the implications therein the big surprise was that I was completely unsure how to define it or even really think about it. Naturally our minds move into thinking about the combination of [...]

Read the full article →

Follow up… Living Missionally

January 21, 2010

Last night Jake talked at the DC Cru large group meeting about thinking through ways to live missionally – how to live so that everyone around you sees and hears about Christ in a way that they all have opportunities to respond to the Gospel.
When he wasn’t being awkward and the beginning and end he [...]

Read the full article →

Grace, Effort and Earning

September 21, 2009
Thumbnail image for Grace, Effort and Earning

A few weeks ago Jake forwarded Carrie and I an article from Dallas Willard called “Live Life to the Full.” Willard teaches philosophy at the University of Southern California.
I mostly just wanted to share a quote from it, but it would be worth the 10 minutes to read the whole article. Anyhow, this is the [...]

Read the full article →

Tim Keller: The Gospel, Moralism and Irreligion [video]

August 22, 2009
Read the full article →

Knowing What It’s Not

June 8, 2009

Thanks largely to some thoughts from Tim Keller, some friends and I have been thinking a ton this year about how a large part of grasping the good news of Jesus is being able to distinguish it from the not-so-good-news of Religiosity — that being “You-Better-Get-Your-Act-Together-So-God-And-The-Rest-Of-Us-Can-Tolerate-You.”
Like most of what Matt Chandler says, this clip [...]

Read the full article →

Light.

May 8, 2009

We have a creative God who is first revealed as Creator. Genesis 1:1-3, in the beginning God created the heavens and the earth…it was formless and void…the Spirit was hovering over the surface of the dark waters…THEN GOD SPOKE “Let there be light” and there was light. God is an artist and even in [...]

Read the full article →

The Pursuit of Happiness

April 28, 2009

Today, we have spent a lot of time on campus and in this room talking about happiness, what it is, and how we get it. Nearly every person I know desires happiness and spends the majority of his or her time pursuing happiness. To Benjamin Franklin, happiness was simple; beer was proof to [...]

Read the full article →